
Between art and agenda
30 October 2024
What do Villa Tugendhat in Brno, the Zentrum Paul Klee in Bern, and the Gropiushaus in Berlin have in common (besides being located in cities starting with a 'B')? All of them are icons of Bauhaus architecture. The Bauhaus movement, which emerged in the early 20th century, reshaped modern design and architecture by advocating the principle that "form follows function." Emphasising simplicity and practicality, Bauhaus challenged traditional fine art by integrating applied arts. It blurred the lines between artistry and craftsmanship, arguing that a building could be beautiful just like fine art could be practical.
However, not everyone celebrates Bauhaus. With the movement's 100th anniversary impending, Germany's far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party submitted a motion titled 'The Wrong Path of Modernism', calling for a critical reassessment of Bauhaus. The party claims that Bauhaus "raped the human need for comfort in every conceivable artistic way."
What many consider a milestone in European cultural integration, the AfD criticises as a "bland homogenisation" of art across Europe. Their call for a "reappraisal" echoes the rhetoric of 1933, when the Nazis shut down Bauhaus, dismissing it as "un-German" for its embrace of progressive ideals. Since Bauhaus was associated with leftist thinkers, including Jewish members, it was an easy target for the Nazis. Many members fled abroad, explaining the international diffusion of the movement. The Nazi crackdown later turned into the infamous 'Degenerate Art' (Entartete Kunst) exhibitions, where the Nazis publicly ridiculed Bauhaus and other modern artworks.
![]() | Constanze Sendler Even though the AfD's motion was rejected, its intent – instrumentalising art to serve ideological aims – should make us pause. This isn't the party's first attempt to make art a nationalist project: last year, it introduced the 'Caspar David Friedrich Prize for Painting,' named after a German romantic painter, to be awarded only to artists who contribute to "a specifically German painting style." While the AfD's drive for nationalism and 'pure' German culture brings a chilling sense of déjà vu, this is no isolated instance in Europe. In Italy, the neo-fascist movement CasaPound has long used art to promote a "traditional" Italian identity, mirroring Mussolini's use of art to reinforce fascist values. Both in Hungary and Poland, Fidesz and PiS respectively redirect cultural funding to projects that align with Catholic and nationalist narratives. If this little history lesson caught your interest, make sure to visit the Bauhaus Museum in Weimar. Historically and artistically, it's one of the most fascinating museums I've ever been in. If you happen to be near Dresden, the Caspar David Friedrich exhibition is very worth a visit too. Even though the AfD wants to convince you otherwise, it's actually possible to enjoy modern and romantic art likewise. |
Welcome to The European Correspondent
Europe lacks true European media: in Germany alone, there are more media devoted exclusively to football than news outlets specialising on Europe. The established players mainly focus on Brussels and European institutions. The European Correspondent aims to change that. We cover the whole of Europe and write for a community of citizens who want to look beyond their own national borders. Without European journalism, there is no European civil society.
〉Read our manifesto
〉The stories we would like to write for you
Become a donor!
The European Correspondent is fully funded by its readers. We can only produce the newsletter with your support - and work towards the bigger project: building true European media. Donate now!
With your help, we can create true European journalism. Thank you!
We are non-profit. Every donated € goes directly into The European Correspondent.